Will Hostile Journalist James Booth’s recent tabloid-style attacks on FinTechs like Lanistar hurt Dow Jones Reputation?

Regardless of James Booth's motivations, Dow Jones may find itself losing its edge if journalists continue to stray into tabloid-style writing

Dow Jones publishes business news and financial information in a variety of media. What once started as a small news agency in a Wall Street basement has now developed into a worldwide news establishment. The company has worked with several prestigious brands and is widely regarded as an information powerhouse. The founders believe their success is due to its 'relentless pursuit of accuracy, depth, and innovation'. However, recently this pursuit is being undermined by the publication of tabloid-style articles from journalists, such as James Booth.

James Booth

Source: https://talkingbiznews.com/they-talk-biz-news/financial-news-hires-booth-for-legal-and-professional-services-coverage/

James Booth works for Financial News, a Dow Jones publication. He covers legal and professional services news. He recently released a sequence of stories about the controversial fintech company, Lanistar. Mr. Booth has written eight articles so far, and what was once an informative and valuable journal seems to be sliding into over-sensationalized tabloid-style writing.

James Booth's pointed journalism has led to some sources suggesting that someone with an agenda against Lanistar or fintech, in general, could be behind this. Is James Booth connected with individuals who want to damage competitors or the fintech industry as a whole – who knows but whilst no connection has been confirmed, could this explain why Mr. Booth has taken such a keen interest in Lanistar.

Regardless of James Booth's motivations, Dow Jones may find themselves losing their edge if journalists continue to stray into tabloid-style writing and away from the historic principles and values of Dow Jones. As Mr. Booth continues to target Lanistar, how Dow Jones will address the fallout?