.png){kind=logo}
Swan Bitcoin, one of the prominent players in the cryptocurrency mining market, has filed a legal case against some of its former managers and another company, Proton Management.
The lawsuit in the US District Court for the Central District of California alleges that these individuals and the competitor conspired to disrupt Swan’s mining operations.
Documented sources state that ex-Swan personnel engaged in the theft of trade secrets and customer database information to form Proton Management and create a rivalry with their previous employer.
The complaint highlights that Michael Holmes, the former Business Development Head at Swan, is the mastermind of the new enterprise.
Swan’s former chief information officer and mining division head, Raphael Zagury, is now in charge of Proton as its CEO. These discoveries have raised speculation on corporate sabotage within this industry, especially where high-value digital commodities such as Bitcoin are involved.
In Swan’s legal document, a sequential flow of events indicates tactical defamation by the sacked officials. The complaint accuses these people of hatching a scheme involving Tether, a significant financial supporter of Swan’s mining business.
Some of this scheme was said to entail Tether serving Swan with a default notice, essentially funneling support to Proton instead. This coincided with Swan experiencing massive resignations on August 8 and 9, and Tether sent an email on August 12 stating it would be taking its partnership to Proton.
The lawsuit alleges that the defendants downloaded software code and other proprietary business information and electronically stripped employees away from Swan. This allegedly exposed Swan and interfered with its operations, which could have resulted in lost business opportunities and a harmed reputation.
Swan is now pursuing an application for a permanent injunction to halt any further violation of its intelligent property rights and to take back the allegedly stolen materials.
This legal fight exemplifies fears over protecting liberties and corporate management in the rising crypto economy. Due to its potential impact, the decision made in this case can affect how similar cases are resolved, determining the measures to protect corporations against insiders.
