Let’s explore the specifics of Evolving Paradigms of AI and Refugee Protection
International custom (BASIC) is a framework that applies to national jurisdictions worldwide. It encompasses refugee rights, which possess five characteristics: cosmological, binding, blended, codependent, and interconnected. BASIC operates based on the dignity of its users. Refugee rights are centered around human dignity, which defines the concept of “refugee rights.”
These rights inherently uphold dignity. However, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) introduces new challenges to human equality across all sectors. AI violates international human rights standards by utilizing algorithms that diminish humanity. Presently, AI lacks consideration for humanitarianism. It relies on metrics that fail to protect humanity or alleviate human suffering in Refugee Status Determination (RSD) procedures.
The book “AI Paradigms Programming” is the first text to cover advanced Common Lisp approaches to creating significant AI systems. The following sections detail the evolving paradigms of AI and their impact on refugee protection:
There is a growing interest in utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in asylum and immigration systems and border security. Legal, technological, and policy developments in this field are receiving increased scrutiny from academics and members of civil society. However, this sector has received limited policy attention compared to other high-risk AI environments.
Since states bear specific responsibilities towards individuals seeking refuge and humanitarian protection at national borders, adopting AI in asylum and immigration, contexts raises uncertainty about governments’ ability to fulfill their human rights obligations.
The risks associated with AI systems include the potential for significant harm, as they might cause or contribute to the practice of “refoulement.”
Refoulement refers to wrongfully returning asylum seekers to their country of origin or an unsafe country where they may face persecution or serious human rights violations. Using AI in asylum settings also raises concerns about fairness and due process.
Recent efforts towards responsible innovation provide reasons for optimism. Governments are focusing on implementing AI in asylum-related decision-making processes that are believed to have fewer conflicts with domestic and international legal principles.
However, AI that aligns with human rights faces substantial challenges due to the restrictive and ever-changing nature of refugee and immigration policies in many nations. Additionally, there are systemic issues concerning fairness and access to rights. Furthermore, it significantly hampers community and private sector participation in responsible and collaborative AI development.
Future systems and policies can benefit from emerging AI safeguards based on principles of good governance, such as human control, transparency, and algorithmic impact assessments. However, these general principles must be adapted to the asylum context by drawing upon legal standards designed to prevent outcomes that violate human rights.
What’s More?
At the national and regional levels, it is essential to focus on how AI tools can aid decision-making processes based on human rights in complex and politicized systems without exacerbating the situation. The interactions between AI and asylum seekers or refugees will serve as a test case for future AI legislation and governance at both national and regional levels. The course of action will also be influenced by global AI standard-setting exercises, such as UN-based technical standards and high-level multinational initiatives.
