.png){kind=logo}
In recent years, AI has swiftly changed industries and people’s daily lives and evoked many discussions. One of the most popular and frequently mentioned AI models is OpenAI’s ChatGPT. It is an advanced language model that produces text that has been written by a person. Although it has shown a lot of potential in fields like customer service, content creation and even education, a series of incidents have happened with ChatGPT that raised questions about its ethical and legal implications.
After its release in late December 2022, ChatGPT received a lot of attention for its capacity to have a logically continuous, contextually relevant conversation. Companies started incorporating it into various operations, and people discovered it to be a useful device for different tasks like creating concepts, outlining drafts, creating code, etc.
One of the main issues that is being raised about ChatGPT is the wrong information that it may provide in certain instances. ChatGPT is subjected to patterns from enormous datasets, some of which can be false or misleading. Cases of people getting wrong information regarding their health or investments have raised concerns. The risks are even higher when people share false data for cases in which accuracy is pivotal, like health-related or legal issues.
OpenAI has tried to address the problem by putting out disclaimers saying that the responses require human supervision. However, many critics insist that such disclaimers may not be enough to stop people from blindly trusting the tool’s responses. This challenge of misrepresentation is not only capable of harming certain users, but it can also potentially erode people’s trust in AI technologies in general.
Systemic bias and discrimination in ChatGPT are certainly a huge concern. These biases stem from the training data that may contain the same discriminatory values prevailing in the larger society. Some of the gender, racial, or cultural biases that users observe are considered violations of equity and fairness by them. For instance, it is possible to come up with a model that contains prejudices such as stereotyping and discriminating against individuals of a given subgroup, thus deepening social injustices.
There is no set method to eliminate this bias. OpenAI has accepted the call to enhance its model’s fairness. However, the challenge of removing the unfairness embedded in its algorithm due to the training data remains an arduous task. The ethical implications of this characteristic of ChatGPT are huge. The danger is that anti-social elements can use such systems as instruments to magnify social prejudices to create unrest in society.
Another major problem that has been raised by many is privacy and security issues. There are instances when users interact with AI, they find it necessary to disclose personal details or sensitive information. OpenAI’s privacy policies have methods for handling and protecting a user’s data, data breaches, or misuse of sensitive information.
For instance, if ChatGPT produced text that proximities the specific writing style of a particular individual they would be in direct violation of that person’s patent. The issues of sharing legal responsibilities in such situations are less clear. Therefore, there is a need to develop better legal rules regarding AI and data protection.
With organizations adopting ChatGPT in several industries, there is a concern that has been raised about job loss. However, as the capabilities of AI systems increase, they are becoming capable of providing services like handling consumer calls, content writing, or even coding. As a result, there is a possibility of automation of such positions. Whilst enthusiasts prove that AI improves efficiency and leaves employees available to do more valuable work, the question of fairness is left out of the equation as millions of people can be displaced by machines.
Besides, there is a question related to responsibility. Specifically, who draws such outputs, or who is at the helm of drawing such detrimental or obscene outputs when an AI system is involved? The developer or the user? This ambiguity raises questions about the accountability of AI tools.
They state that the legal issues that arise about AI technologies are dynamic given the ever-changing nature of AI technologies. Policymakers across the globe are faced with the challenge of how to manage and containing AI while at the same time promoting innovation. However, the rate at which technology is promoted exceeds the rate of enacting legislation on the same thus leaving large gaps in legal prescriptions in the implementation of AI.
Institutions like the European Union are in the process of developing holistic measures that aim to put in place an AI bill but the measures taken and the approach used differ from one jurisdiction to the other. Such discrepancies may result in misunderstandings by the companies and users, which, in turn, will hamper the proper implementation of AI solutions.
Analyzing the controversies of ChatGPT shows that there is a great problem of finding a middle ground in the AL advancement. The current issues need to be addressed by developers themselves, businesses, users, and policymakers, who should develop ethical standards and regulatory measures to address the problem to protect consumers who, in many cases, are left exposed and unprotected.
There is an improvement in the following aspects of OpenAI, such as increasing model accuracy, minimizing biases, or enhancing the user’s privacy. But the path to ethical artificial intelligence is ongoing. Mainly, among important concepts, concerns with the inclusiveness of diverse perspectives in the development process, testing for biases, and transparency will be the key to building up trust with users.
The issues that relate to ChatGPT can be seen as the issues typical of the AI industry at large. So, as we proceed further to enabling potential of the IoT technologies, the importance of ethical and legal concerns of artificial intelligence cannot be overruled. We can unlock the benefits of using advanced tools such as ChatGPT while avoiding the adverse impacts arising from the negative applications if not well controlled. The future of this technology is very bright but very sensitive in the sense that it should not be exploited in such a way that it will cause havoc in society.
